Transformative Character Classes

Last modified date

A post contributed to the Transitions and Transformations Blog Carnival.

I was introduced to transformative character classes by 3rd edition D&D. You know what I mean here – a 20th level monk becomes an Outsider… a 10th level Dragon Disciple becomes a Half-Dragon… that sort of thing. Transformative classes might have existed before then. I suppose you could say that in plain-old (Basic-Expert-Etc.) D&D, every class was transformative in the sense that you could become an Immortal. Of course, when everyone is special, no one is.

In any case, I thought these things were weird at first. Then, one day, I read the bit about gods in D&D generally being (as a prerequisite) 20HD Outsiders. It hit me immediately – “Hey. Monks, when they hit 20th level, are 20HD Outsiders.” That was a pretty cool realization – that a life dedicated to introspection and perfection of onesself could be a shortcut to divinity. It opened my mind to some of the possibilities of these classes. Around this time, I was introduced to other classes of this sort: the Spirit Shaman (in Complete Divine) becomes fae, the Dread Necromancer becomes a Lich, and the Green Star Adept (in Complete Arcane) becomes (strangely) a construct. There are others as well.

I also decided to play one of these classes. I created a character based around the idea of self-evolution (I named him Darwane) for Jeff’s crazy-high-powered-gestalt game. The gestalt thing allowed me a lot of freedom to play with classes. Among other things, Darwane had 3 levels of Human Paragon, 10 levels of Dragon Disciple, and 3 levels of Half-Dragon Paragon (mixed in with a few levels of Monk, Fighter, and Paladin and a bunch of levels of Sorcerer) before he was done. He was a ton of fun to play… and not just because he essentially one-shotted a two-headed, half-dragon (x2) Tarrasque.

I’m feeling like I am rambling today, so you are going to get some half-baked ideas on where transformative character classes could have gone in 3.5 D&D:

  • The Druid. Druids are arguably one of the most overpowered classes in the game. Having played one to 20th level (without trying to optimize), I can attest to this. I could see splitting the Druid up into, say, three transformative subclasses aimed, respectively, at transforming into a fae, elemental, or plant creature. Wild shape would be altered for each of these, beginning with short-term, partial transformations.
  • Feat trees. There are several feat trees that touch on the transformative such as Fey Heritage, Fiendish Heritage, and Draconic feats. Why not add an option to make these actually transformative? …or have more of them? I could see a Celestial Dedicant exalted feat tree that turned one into an Outsider, for instance…
  • Divorce transformations of this sort from creature type. The creature type system in 3.5 is pretty odd, anyway. When you want to give traits of a creature type, go ahead. Otherwise, just say something along the lines of the Elven Blood property of Half-Elves (for example, For all effects related to race or creature type a 20th level Druid of the Green is considered a Plant).

What about PC transformations outside of 3.5 D&D? Well, part of what I’ve been talking about above is a transformation between two strict categories within the system (such as Humanoid and Outsider). Most systems don’t have such categories. Transformation can still happen there, of course, it just has more of a descriptive aspect to it. In Mutants and Masterminds or HERO, your PC can slowly turn into a dragon – but you do it by the powers and such that you buy and the way that you describe them. In 4e, of course, transformations can be fitted into Epic Destinies (and, occasionally, Paragon Paths) pretty easily. For games without a real advancement system (FATE, Sorcerer), transformation will likely need collaboration between the GM and player (or a mischievous GM)… and it potentially makes a nice alternative for players who might be afraid of PC stagnation.



6 Responses

  1. Cool stuff, man. A couple comments, though:

    For the monk, he isn’t actually a 20 HD Outsider, as that would mean he had 20 Outsider Hit Dice (not levels). Yeah, 3e is picky that way.

    For similar reasons, you get none of the actual features of the creature type until you have at least one racial hit die. So the Monk doesn’t gain darkvision or proficiency with all martial weapons.

    To see this in action, see the PC races of Genasi (outsider, none of the outsider traits like all martial weapons) and Elan (from XPH, aberration, same stuff).

    As such, the statement of “Divorce transformations of this sort from creature type.” is somewhat superfluous, as the effect you’re trying to achieve is already there.

    The main thing that these transformations do has to do with spell targetting. The monk can no longer be targetted by Hold Person, for instance, nor by any other spell that specifies humanoid.

    Oddly, he can also no longer be resurrected…

    In any case, by making it more like the Half Elf, you actually make the class more vulnerable, with no appreciable benefit.

    If you do it, but then add the line “and is no longer treated as his original type for the same purposes”, you make it… well, exactly as it already is, but a whole lot clearer.

    Yeah… 3e is weird…

  2. For the monk, he isn’t actually a 20 HD Outsider, as that would mean he had 20 Outsider Hit Dice (not levels). Yeah, 3e is picky that way.

    Oh, I know 3e is picky… but he is still an Outsider with 20HD… and the idea is too cool to pass up. Anyway, the quote I was referencing from the SRD is “Most deities are creatures of the outsider type (usually with 20 outsider Hit Dice).” So the ‘most’ and ‘usually’ allow for some exceptions.

  3. also, “Unlike other outsiders, the monk can still be brought back from the dead as if she were a member of her previous creature type. “

    Best of both worlds?

  4. Guh…

    Something we both missed from the Monk entry:

    “She is forevermore treated as an outsider rather than as a humanoid (or whatever the monk’s creature type was) for the purpose of spells and magical effects”

    So the monk is only for spells and effects, gains no abilities, can still be resurrected (it specifies that later) and is still technically a humanoid.

    For other classes and transformations, the above still applies, however.

  5. Yeah, there’s no restriction to being an outsider to become a deity, though I think that that “most” was put in there mainly to accommodate the undead gods. 😛

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Post comment